Every bid scored the same way
Submissions are checked against the requirements that were actually published, not a reviewer's recollection of them.
EXPLORE ↘
KognosysSENANGAITalk to us ↗Evaluate every bid on the same criteria.
Score submissions against the published requirements, cite the page behind each score and keep the evaluation trail intact.
Explore the page ↓
IGNITE/SPOKES/NODES/INFER/QUERY
01RETRIEVE
02REASON
03VERIFY
GOVERNED MEMORY ACTIVE
Personal · Teamspace · OrganisationIdentity and scope are resolved before people or agents can retrieve knowledge.
Each score traced to a page
A low score on a requirement links to the exact page in the bid where that requirement was, or was not, addressed.
EXPLORE ↘Claims checked before they are trusted
Vendor claims about certification, deployment model and support are checked against what the submission actually documents.
EXPLORE ↘HOW A BID EVALUATION RUNS
Every evaluator working from the same requirements.
The published requirements set the scoring criteria before the first bid is opened.
01PUBLISH
Requirements connected as the scoring source
02SCORE
Each bid checked against every requirement
03CITE
Score linked to the page it came from
04DECIDE
Panel reviews the cited comparison
CRITERIAPUBLISHED, NOT RECALLED
SCORINGCITED TO THE BID
VENDOR CLAIMSCHECKED AGAINST TEXT
LIVE EVALUATION
One use case.
Three weeks.
Evidence, not theatre.
Bring your compliance, risk and technology leads. Pick a question your organisation already argues about.
Book a working session ↗